Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-03-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0536 HB 57 CSHB 57(FIN) am was before the House in second reading. The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment No. 30 would be moved to the end of the amendments. Amendment No. 31 was not offered. 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0537 Amendment No. 32 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg, Westlake, Spohnholz, Gara, Ortiz, Wool, Claman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tuck, Stutes, Kawasaki, Josephson, Drummond, Fansler, LeDoux, Seaton, Foster, Parish, and Tarr: Page 32, following line 21: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities not use any appropriation to hire further private sector contractors until a study on the overall delivery of capital projects and optimization of those capital projects, from onset to closeout, is conducted. To proceed with privatization, the study must show how the state would save money by contracting out positions to the private sector and how the state's services would be improved by contracting out positions to the private sector. Without demonstrating a clear economic benefit to the state, privatization may not proceed." Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Representative Knopp objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Spohnholz, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 32 was not adopted. 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0538 Amendment No. 33 was offered by Representatives Rauscher and Kawasaki: Page 28, line 8: Delete "should" Insert "shall" Representative Rauscher moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 33 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent to rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 32 (page 537). There was objection. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 32?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Rescind previous action on Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson And so, the motion passed. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0539 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 32 was adopted. Amendment No. 34 was offered by Representatives Seaton and Foster: Page 56, line 22: Delete "sec. 22(n)" Insert "sec. 22(o)" Page 66, following line 20: Insert a new subsection to read: "(g) The sum of $30,000,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the public education fund (AS 14.17.300)." Reletter the following subsections accordingly. Page 67, line 24: Delete "(n)" Insert "(o)" Page 68, line 1: Delete "(o)" Insert "(p)" Page 74, following line 31: Insert a new subsection to read: "(e) If the amount of the appropriation made in sec. 35(c), ch. 3, 4SSLA 2016, is insufficient to cover the appropriation from the general fund made in sec. 22(g) of this Act, the appropriation made in sec. 22(g) of this Act is reduced by the amount of the shortfall." Page 75, line 1: Delete "and 29" Insert "22(g), 29, and 32(e)" 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0540 Representative Seaton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 34 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson And so, Amendment No. 34 was adopted. Amendment No. 35 was offered by Representatives Reinbold and Knopp: Page 7, line 33: Delete "236,608,500" Insert "229,680,900" Delete "215,693,700" Insert "208,766,100" Page 8, line 6: Delete "10,209,300" Insert "3,281,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 35 be adopted. 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0541 Representative Kawasaki objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 35 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 35 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Knopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool And so, Amendment No. 35 was not adopted. Amendment No. 36 was offered by Representatives Reinbold and Knopp: Page 23, line 5: Delete "48,727,600" Insert "46,602,600" Delete "22,028,700" Insert "19,903,700" Page 23, line 19: Delete "8,942,100" Insert "6,817,100" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 36 be adopted. Representative Grenn objected. 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0542 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 36 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 36 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool And so, Amendment No. 36 was not adopted. Amendment No. 37 was offered by Representatives Reinbold and Knopp: Page 20, line 14: Delete "1,692,844,000" Insert "1,692,382,000" Delete "517,729,400" Insert "517,267,400" Page 20, line 15: Delete "140,054,800" Insert "139,592,800" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 37 be adopted. Representative Gara objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 37 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0543 CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 37 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Knopp, Kopp, Neuman, Pruitt, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Rauscher, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wilson, Wool And so, Amendment No. 37 was not adopted. Representative Saddler placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Amendment No. 38 was not offered. Amendment No. 39 was offered by Representatives Tilton, Wilson, Saddler, Millett, Sullivan-Leonard, Kopp, Rauscher, Chenault, Knopp, Talerico, Johnson, Johnston, and Birch: Page 5, line 14: Delete "11,580,900" Insert "9,448,700" Delete "6,637,300" Insert "6,419,600" Delete "4,943,600" Insert "3,029,100" Page 5, line 17: Delete all material. Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Tilton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 39 be adopted. Representative Guttenberg objected. 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0544 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 39 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 39 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool And so, Amendment No. 39 was not adopted. Amendment No. 40 was offered by Representatives Wilson, Reinbold, Millett, Sullivan-Leonard, Johnston, Birch, Pruitt, Saddler, Johnson, Tilton, and Knopp: Page 16, line 27: Delete "60,073,900" Insert "58,428,700" Page 16, line 28: Delete "13,645,000" Insert "15,290,200" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 40 be adopted. There was objection. Amendment to Amendment No. 40 was offered by Representative Kawasaki: 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0545 Under Page 16, line 27: Delete all material. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 40 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, Amendment to Amendment No. 40 was adopted. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 40 as amended. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Wilson: Page 10, line 33: Delete "248,501,600" Insert "246,501,600" Delete "20,000,200" Insert "18,000,200" Page 11, line 17: Delete all material. Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 41 be adopted. Representative Drummond objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 41 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 57(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 41 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2017-03-14 House Journal Page 0546 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool And so, Amendment No. 41 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 57(FIN) am would be held to tomorrow's calendar in second reading. The House adjourned.